March 14, 2025, 08:48:31 PM

Author Topic: Akina's build  (Read 258319 times)

Offline airwolf16

Re: Power plant 2.0
« Reply #270 on: October 20, 2013, 09:24:18 PM »
LOVE THE COLOR!!!

Great looking car!

An Inspiration
“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

Offline Bowtie7

Re: Power plant 2.0
« Reply #271 on: October 20, 2013, 10:07:30 PM »
The car got crashed pretty badly at Road Atlanta a few weeks ago while leading a 3hr enduro with 15 minutes left. I already have a really straight chassis with cage and Moton shocks available if Russ pulls the trigger. I'll swap everything over and ultimately buld a better car.

I know you will have an absolute blast in your car!
I do love what I do!

Offline WannaBeFast

  • Supporting Member
  • Top Fuel
  • Posts: 2875
  • Single and Looking
  • View Gallery
    • View Profile
Re: Power plant 2.0
« Reply #272 on: October 20, 2013, 10:12:28 PM »
pimp!

Offline AKINA FC

Power plant 3.0
« Reply #273 on: November 03, 2013, 12:51:38 PM »
Well I had a bad turn of events happen with the engine, cracked the #7 cylinder. I believe it was a combination of things that made this occur but mainly suspect it detonated, lifted the head - injested coolant and cracked the cylinder. Just road the edge for to long on pump gas and it finally bit me.
Everything seemed to be running great and never would have noticed had I not done my usuall walk around inspection that I do every time I start it and before I pull it back in the shop, only thing that made me realize something was wrong was the over flow can was full of water, which it never has more than just a little bit it in it.
Knowing it pushed water I was figuring the worst so I pulled the heads and found this smiling at me :(

So thus the full tear down began, engine is out and fully apart. Everything looks great and no other problems noted. Was very pleased with how the bearings looked so at least everything can be re-used if I choose to. Pistons look perfect, heads are great.

So now onto version number 3. Small list of changes haha
new gm LS3 block - full blueprint again with 1/2" head studs this time
new wiseco pistions - 9.5 -10 to 1 compression again - no overboring like last round - stock bore 4.065 with gfx rings
re-use the rods and crank
LS9 heads and gaskets - LS3 or Fast intake manifold
same camshaft
Any thoughts from those that read this are greatly appreciated, failure and build wise for the new one. Will be ordering parts in the next few days and selling old ones like my LS6 manifold, cylinder heads, rockers, head studs - things I cant re-use with the new build.

Offline digitalsolo

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #274 on: November 03, 2013, 01:52:15 PM »
Bummer.  :(

I am considering yanking the heads on mine just to look around and check everything over since I have everything else off.   Hopefully my luck holds up better. 

New setup sounds STRONG(er).
Blake MF'ing McBride
1988 Mazda RX7 - Turbo LS1/T56/ProEFI/8.8/Not Slow...   sold.
1965 Mustang Coupe - TT Coyote, TR6060, modern brakes/suspension...
2007 Aston Martin V8 Vantage - Gen V LT4/TR6060, upper/lower pullies, headers, tune.
2021 Tesla Model 3 Performance - Stock...ish.

Offline zbrown

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #275 on: November 03, 2013, 02:43:28 PM »
that stinks but you'll be alright.  I think the ls9/ls9 are a heck of a casting.

are you going to change fuels or what are you going to do for that? E85?
8.50/165



Offline AKINA FC

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #276 on: November 03, 2013, 04:10:05 PM »
Yeah Blake if It was me I would pull them just to check everything out, you probably have no issues though. I believe my problem came from reduced cylinder wall thickness and running regular fuel, plugs never showed an issues though. I ran fresh plugs and would check them after a pull on my favorite backroad , I was surpised to find this failure. No knock registered on the data logs either.

Zack I really dont know what I want to do, meth injection or E85. I would like to go with E85 but have never ran it before and dont know exactly what kind of fuel consumtion increase I will see from it, I currently use about 5 gallons of fuel per race session - 8 sessions per weekend. Meth would be a cheaper alternative but for some reason i just dont feel real warm and fuzzy about having to count on that system.

Offline Demon

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #277 on: November 03, 2013, 06:00:26 PM »
I hate meth injection!!!

I vote E85. You may just have to top off in between runs. At full power, e85 usually burns 20-25% more fuel.
'93 RX7 (co-project with macnewma)
'95 Supra Turbo Billet GT42-76

Offline zbrown

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #278 on: November 03, 2013, 07:49:45 PM »
You honestly don't even need that much E.  Even at e30 to e50 I wouldn't be one bit scared

E50 is all I run, I will probably move to an even lower E percentage to get more injector headroom and am not scared one bit

Demon is on crack too. Definitely more that 20-25% more. Any engine dyno I have seen the bsfc is always .85 area or a bit more
8.50/165



Offline Demon

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #279 on: November 03, 2013, 08:39:46 PM »
You honestly don't even need that much E.  Even at e30 to e50 I wouldn't be one bit scared

E50 is all I run, I will probably move to an even lower E percentage to get more injector headroom and am not scared one bit

Demon is on crack too. Definitely more that 20-25% more. Any engine dyno I have seen the bsfc is always .85 area or a bit more

I like crack.
'93 RX7 (co-project with macnewma)
'95 Supra Turbo Billet GT42-76

Offline AKINA FC

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #280 on: November 05, 2013, 08:41:51 PM »
LOL Thanks for the info, sounds like ethanol it is then. A gallon more per session is not a big deal.
All we have around here is e85. Just need to narrow down pump and injectors, still staying with factory pcm though. Trying to find a in-tank solution to suit my hp needs, kinda tough so far. i dont want to change my tank or sump it since I already modified it with baffles and foam, works great down to 15% fuel level, that and sumping it would interfere with the rear diffuser.
Kinda Changed things up a bit after some thought on the engine build. Ordered the LSA block instead and decided to keep the upper end of the motor I already have and machine the heads for the 1/2" studs. I think that they will still suit my needs, Im not really looking to make a ton more power, just strengthen things up a bit.

Offline digitalsolo

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #281 on: November 05, 2013, 09:11:14 PM »
Im not really looking to make a ton more power

Whatever you need to tell yourself.   ;)
Blake MF'ing McBride
1988 Mazda RX7 - Turbo LS1/T56/ProEFI/8.8/Not Slow...   sold.
1965 Mustang Coupe - TT Coyote, TR6060, modern brakes/suspension...
2007 Aston Martin V8 Vantage - Gen V LT4/TR6060, upper/lower pullies, headers, tune.
2021 Tesla Model 3 Performance - Stock...ish.

Offline AKINA FC

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #282 on: November 06, 2013, 10:24:41 AM »
LOL I think if I keep telling my self this it will help keep me under control and the wife happy haha
Any recommendations for pump/pumps -injectors?

Offline digitalsolo

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #283 on: November 06, 2013, 10:49:50 AM »
I run a Magnafuel 750 (4303) and I like it fine.  No issues so far.   I know quite a few people with Fuelab stuff that are very happy also (though I think every Fuelab user I know has had at least one pump failure).   I'm not a big multi-pump fan, personally.

I run Lucas/Delphi 120# injectors, as does BeasTT.  No issues.  My friend runs the 160# units on his S10 that is running 8s in the quarter, no issues there either.   All of them are stainless body, low impedance and rated for pretty much any fuel you can think up (minus nitro, maybe, haha).
Blake MF'ing McBride
1988 Mazda RX7 - Turbo LS1/T56/ProEFI/8.8/Not Slow...   sold.
1965 Mustang Coupe - TT Coyote, TR6060, modern brakes/suspension...
2007 Aston Martin V8 Vantage - Gen V LT4/TR6060, upper/lower pullies, headers, tune.
2021 Tesla Model 3 Performance - Stock...ish.

Offline AKINA FC

Re: Power plant 3.0
« Reply #284 on: November 06, 2013, 12:10:27 PM »
Thanks Blake, forgot about fuel lab. Im thinking the 42402 intank, 565 regulator with -10 feed and -8 return, nice and clean single feed and return. I was thinking the bosch 127lb HI, direct replacment units. Thoughts?